Biblioteca

Sendo a análise fundamentalista a base exclusiva de nossa filosofia de gestão, o estudo é, para a Dynamo, ferramenta essencial e cotidiana.

Referências Bibliográficas Carta Dynamo 121 e 122

Companies mentioned: BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Enel, Engie, ENI, E.ON, Equinor, Exxon Mobil, Iberdrola, Marathon, Occidental Petroleum, Phillips 66, Repsol, Saudi Aramco, Shell, Total Energies, Valero Documents: Articles of Association Bylaws Proxy Statements and Votings Specific Documents on Energy Transition BP (2023, 2024) From IOC to IEC; Net Zero Ambition: Progress Update Chevron (2023) Advancing Energy Progress: Climate Change Resilience Report ConocoPhillips (2022-2023) Plan for the Net-Zero Energy Transition: Progress Report Enel (2022, 2023) Zero Emission Ambition; Sustainability Report Engie (2022, 2023, 2024) Integrated Reports; Climate Reports ENI (2023) For A Just Transition E.ON (2023) Integrated Annual Report: It´s on us Equinor 2022, 2023) Energy Transition Plan; The Equinor Book; Integrated Annual Report Exxon Mobil (2024) Advancing Climate Solutions Iberdrola (2023) Sustainability Report; Purposes and Values of the Iberdrola Group Marathon (2023) Perspectives on Climate-Relate Scenarios: Risk and Opportunities Occidental (2023) Climate Report: Leading the Way in Carbon Management Phillips 66 (2024) Sustainability and People Report Repsol (2023, 2024) Integrated Management Report; Global Sustainability Plan Saudi Aramco (2022) Investing in Growth, Innovating for Sustainability Shell (2021, 2024) Energy Transition Strategy; Energy Transition Progress Report Total Energies (2022, 2023) Company Strategy; Sustainability & Climate – Progress Report Valero (2023) ESG Report Other Papers, Reports and Books: Bebchuk, L., Kastiel, K., Tallarita, R. (2021) For Whom Corporate Leaders Bargain. Southern California Law Review. Bebchuk, L., Kastiel, K., Tallarita, R. (2022) Does Enlighted Shareholder Value Add Value? Harvard Law School, Discussion Paper n. 1077. Bebchuk, L., Tallarita, R. (2020) The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance Bebchuk, L., Tallarita, R. (2022) Will Corporations Deliver Value to All Stakeholders? Harvard John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business, Discussion Paper n. 1078. Condon, M. (2023) What´s Scope 3 Good For? University of California, Davis, vol 56:1921. Davies, P. (2023) Shareholder Voice and Corporate Purpose: The Purposelessness of Mandatory Corporate Purpose Statements. ecgi, Law Working Paper n. 666. Freshfields (2024) Trends and Updates from the 2024 Proxy Season Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. The University of Chicago Press. Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York times. Gatti, M., Gomtsian, S. & Romano, A. (2024) Corporate Governance for Carbon Majors. ecgi, Working Paper n. 787. Gen, G. (2024) ESG, Externalities, and the Limits of the Business Judgement Rule: TEPCO Derivative Suit on Fukushima Nuclear Accident and the Expansion of Caremark. ecgi, Law Working Paper n. 780. Gowan, J. (2024) To Survival Legal Challenges, SEC Must Remove Scope 3 From Sustainability Reporting Rule. Bloomberg Finance. Hart, O. & Zingales, L. (2017) Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 2. Hart, O. & Zingales, L. (2022) The New Corporate Governance. University of Chicago Business Law Review, vol 1, Issue 1. Humphrey, J. et al. (2021) The Asymmetry in Responsible Investment Preferences. NBER, Working Paper 29288. IEA - International Energy Association (2023a) Net Zero Roadmap – A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5oC Goal in Reach. IEA - International Energy Association (2023b) Energy Outlook 2023 IEA - International Energy Association (2023c) Global Energy Transitions Stocktake -https://www.iea.org/topics/global-energy-transitions-stocktake IPCC – The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018) Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5oC Justia Law (1919) Dodge x Ford US Michigan Supreme Court Decisions 170 N.W. 688 Lan, L., Wan, W. (2024) ESG and Director´s Duties: Defining and Advancing the Interests of the Company. ecgi, Working Paper no 737. Mayer, C. (2018) Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good. Oxford University Press. Mayer, C. (2022) What is Wrong with Corporate Law? The Purpose of Law and the Law of Purpose. ECGI Working Paper n. 649/2022. Promarket Writers (2016) Unusual Debate at Davos: Lobbying, Maximizing Shareholder Value and the Duty of CEO’s. Apr 1, 2016. Promarket (2020) Milton Friedman 50 Years Latter. Stilger Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Rajan, R., Ramella, P., Zingales, L. (2023) What Purpose Do Corporations Purport? Evidence From Letters to Shareholders. NBER, Working Paper 31054. Roe, M. (2021) Dodge x Ford: What Happened and Why? ecgi, Law Working Paper n. 619 Royal Courts of Justice of England and Wales – RCJEW (2023) ClientEarth x Shell. Case no: BL-2023-000215 Smil, V. (2024) Halfway Between Kyoto and 2050: Zero Carbon is a Highly Unlikely Outcome WRI & WBCSD – World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2001) Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard U.S. Department of Labor (2022) US Department of Labor Announces Final Rule to Remove Barriers to Considering Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in Plan Investments - https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/ebsa/ebsa20221122 U.S. Supr

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto das Cartas Dynamo121 e 122

Referências bibliográficas da Carta Dynamo n. 118

BCG (Boston Consulting Group), 2022. Brazil Climate Report: Seizing Brazil´s Climate Potential. Brazil Climate Summit, Sep22.

Chausson, A. et al. (2020) Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions fir climate change adaptation. Glob Change Biol, 2020,26.

GCCSI (Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute), 2022. Global Status of CCS 2022: Ambition & Action.

European Commission, 2021. Evaluating the Impact of Nature-based Solutions: A Handbook for Practitioners. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.

Girardin, C. et al. (2021) Nature-Based Solutions can help cool the planet – if we act now. Nature, vol 593, May21.

IBRD (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank), 2021. A Catalogue of Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Resilience.

IEA (International Energy Association), 2020. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020: Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage, CCUS in clean energy transition.

IEA (International Energy Association), 2021. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Revised edition, Oct21.

IEA (International Energy Association), 2022. Legal and Regulatory Frameworks for CCUS: An IEA CCUS Handbook.

IEF (International Energy Forum), 2021. Strategies to Scale Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage. Dialogue Insight Report, Sep21.

Ketzer, J., org. (2018) Atlas Brasileiro de Captura e Armazenamento Geológico de CO2. GCCSI, ediPUCRS.

Kleidon, A. (2021) What limits photosynthesis? Identifying the thermodynamic constraints of

the terrestrial biosphere within the Earth system. BBA- Biogenetics, 1862 (2021) 148303.

Liu, Z. et al. (2023) Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2022. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. Vol 4, Apr23.

Samaniego, J. et al. (2022) Nature-Based Solutions and Carbon Dioxide Removal. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). United Nations publication.

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto da Carta Dynamo118

Referências bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo n. 116 e 117

Berry, C. (1978) Alternative Dimensions of Corporate Diversification: An Entropy Approach, Centre de Recherches Interdisciplinaires Droit-et-Economie, Institut des Sciences Economiques.

Bezos, J. (2011 e 2013) Letter to Shareholders.

Bodell, L. (2017) Why Simple Wins: Escape the Complexity Trap and Get to Work That Matters. Bibliomotion.

Bratianu, C. (2019) Exploring Knowledge Entropy in Organizations. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, vol 7, n.3.

Cohen, J. & Stewart, I. (1994) The Collapse of Chaos: Discovering Simplicity on a Complex World. Penguin Books.

Collison, S. & Jay, M. (2012) From Complexity to Simplicity: Unleash your Organization Potential. Palgrave Macmillan.

DeMarco, T. & Lister, T. (1979) Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams. Addison-Wesley.

Eckart, P. (2020) Simplicity for Success in Business - Essentials: The Best of Silicon Valley and McKinsey.

Gill, G. (2020) Complexity, Information Technology and Strategic Decision-Making. Lectures:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfinHCX0jyc&t=1646s

Gribbin, J. (200) Deep Simplicity: Bringing Order to Chaos and Complexity. Random House, NY.

Hastings, R. (2009) Netflix Culture: Freedom & Responsibility.

https://www.slideshare.net/reed2001/culture-1798664

Hershey, D. (2010) Entropy Theory of Aging Systems: Humans, Corporations and the Universe. Imperial College Press.

Hobsbawm, J. (2020) The Simplicity Principle: Six Steps Towards Clarity in a Complex World.

Hock, D. (2005) One From Many: VISA and the Rise of Chaordic Organization. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, CA.

Klein, J. (2000) Corporate Fail by Design: Why organizations Are Built to Fail. Quorum Books, Westport (CO), London.

Kniberg, H. (2014) Spotify engineering culture. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GK1NDTWbkY

Leonard, M. (2015 e 2021) Constellation Software, Inc.: To Our Shareholders.

Maeda, J. (2006) The Laws of Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life

Martinez-Berumen, H. et al. (2014) Developing a Method to Evaluate Entropy in Organizational Systems. Conference on Systems Engineering Research, ScienceDirect.

Morin, E. (2008) On Complexity. Hampton Press, Inc., New Jersey.

Rycrft, R. & Kash, D. (2004) Self-Organizing Innovation Networks: Implications for Globalization. Techovation, 24 0(3), mar,2004.

Siegel, A. & Etzkorn, I. (2013) Simple: Conquering the Crisis of Complexity. Twelve, NY, Boston.

Silverberg, G. (2007) Self-Organization of R&D search in complex technology space. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, ResearchGate, feb.2007.

Taleb, N. (2014) Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. Random House, NY.

Wheatley, M. & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1996) A Simpler Way. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, CA.

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto das Cartas Dynamo116 e 117

Referências bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo n. 114 e 115

Bebchuk, L. & Hirst, S. (2020) Index funds and the future of corporate governance: theory, evidence and policy. ecgi, working paper n. 433/18.

Bebchuk, L. & Kastiel, K. (2019) The perils of small-minority controllers. Harvard Law School, discussion paper n. 895.

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (2018) When one share does not mean one vote: the fight against dual-class capital structures. Lexology.

Carvalhosa, M. (1998) Comentários à lei das Sociedades Anônimas. Editora Saraiva.

Cheffins, B. (2012) The History of corporate governance. ecgi, working paper n. 184/12.

Choi, A. (2016) Concentrated ownership and long-term shareholder value. Harvard Business Law Review, vol. 8.

Coates, J. (2018) The Future of Corporate governance part I: the problem of twelve. Harvard Law School.

Dyck, A. & Zingales, L. (2002) Private benefits of control: an international comparison. NBER working paper series.

Franks, J. & Mayer, C. (2017) Evolution of ownership and control around the world: the changing face of capitalism. ecgi, working paper n. 503/17.

Franks, J. (2020) Institutional ownership and governance. ecgi, working paper n. 656/20.

Gilson, R. (2005) Controlling shareholders and corporate governance: complicating the comparative taxonomy. ecgi, working paper n. 49/05.

Gilson, R. (2016) From corporate law to corporate governance. ecgi, working paper n. 324/16.

Gilson, R. & Gordon, J. (2013) The Agency costs of agency capitalism: activist investors and the revaluation of governance rights. Columbia University School of Law, working paper n. 438.

Gilson, R. & Schwartz, A. (2014) Corporate control and credible commitment. Cópia eletrônica disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2182781#

Goshen, Z. & Hamdani, A. (2016) Corporate control and idiosyncratic vision. The Yale Law Journal.

Goyder, M. & Zimmerman, H. (2010) Tomorrow´s corporate governance: bridging the UK engagement gap through Swedish-style nomination committees. Center for Tomorrow´s Company.

Kim, H. & Michaely, R. (2019) Sticking around too long? Dynamics of the benefits of dual-class voting. Swiss Finance Institute. Research paper series n. 19-09.

La Porta, R. et al. (1996) Law and finance. NBER Working Paper n. 5661.

Lekvall, P. (ed.) (2014) The Nordic corporate governance model. SNS Forlag.                   

Pargendler, M. (2016) The corporate governance obsession. The Journal of Corporation Law, vol. 22:2.

Pargendler, M. (2019) Controlling shareholders in the twenty-first century: complicating corporate governance beyond agency costs. ecgi, working paper n. 483/19.

 

Kim, H. & Michaely, R. (2019) Sticking around too long? Dynamics of the benefits of dual-class voting. Swiss Finance Institute. Research paper series n. 19-09.

 

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto das Cartas Dynamo114 e 115

Referências bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo n. 112 e 113

Bolton, P. et al. (2020) The green swan. Central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Bank for International Settlements.

Brack, D. (2003) Monitoring the Montreal Protocol, in Findlay, Trevor (ed.) Verification Yearbook.

Burke, M. & Hsiang, S. (2015) Global non-Linear Effect of Temperature on Economic Production. Nature, Oct-2015.

Carbon Disclosure Protocol, CDP. (2021) Nearly Half of World´s Biggest Companies Factoring Cost of Carbon into Business. Apr-21

Carattini, S., Levin, S. & Tavoni, A. (2019) Cooperation in the climate commons. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 13, issue 2, summer 19.

Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, CEBRI (2021) Mercado de carbono e artigo: perspectivas para a área florestal. Núcleo Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima, evento online ago, 2021.

Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, CEBRI (2021) As soluções baseadas na natureza (NBS) & green finance: o papel do Acordo de Paris. Núcleo Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima, evento online set, 2021.

Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, CEBRI (2021) Mudança climática, governos e o setor financeiro: o caminho a seguir. Uma conversa com Mark Carney. Núcleo Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima, evento online dez, 2021.

Centro de Debates de Políticas Públicas, CDPP. (2021) Mudanças Climáticas e a Precificação de Carbono. Desafios e Oportunidades de Mercados de Carbono no Brasil. Relatório Completo, out21.

Cooper, R. (2017) The Case for Pricing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In Cramton, P. et. al (ed.).

Crampton, P., Ockenfels, A. & Tirole, J. (2017) Translating the collective climate goal into a common climate commitment. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 11, issue 1, winter 17.

Cramton, P., et al. (ed.), (2017). Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation. The MIT Press.

Cullenward, D. & Victor, D. (2020) Making Climate Policy Work. Polity Press, Cambridge.

Esty. D. & Moffa, A. (2019) Why climate change collective action has failed and what needs to be done within and without the trade regime. Journal of International Economic Law 15(3)

European Union (2021). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Functioning of the European Carbon Market. 26.10.2021

Goldie-Scot, L. (2019) A Behind the Scenes Take on Lithium-ion Battery Prices. BloombergNEF, mar-2019.

International Emissions Trading Association – IETA (2019).  The Economic Potential of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and Implementation Challenges. Sep, 2019.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021, The Physical Science Basis. WHO & UNEP.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022, Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. WHO & UNEP.

International Energy Association – IEA (2015) World Energy Outlook 2015.

International Energy Association – IEA (2021) World Energy Outlook 2021.

International Renewable Energy Agency - IRENA (2020) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2020.

Jenkins, J. (2019) Why Carbon Pricing Falls Short: And What to Do about It. Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, University of Pennsylvania, School of Design.

Jagers, S. et al. (2019) On the Preconditions of Large-scale Collective Action. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, mar-19.

Johannesson, E. (2017) An Analysis of the Paris Agreement. Uppsala Universitet.

Kahneman, D. (2013) Thinking, Fast and Slow.

Kop, R. (2012) The Climate Has Changed – So Must Policy. Resources for the Future.

Krauss, L. (2021) The Physics of Climate Change. Head of Zeus Ltd, London.

Kusnetz, N. (2021) Why the Paris Agreement might be doomed to fail? Inside Climate News.org

Nobre, C. (2021) A Savanização da Amazônia já está ocorrendo. Entrevista jornal Valor Econômico, 5.fev.21.

Nordhaus, W. (2013) The Climate cassino: risk, uncertainty, and economics for a warming world. Yale University Press.

Nordhaus, W. (2017) Climate Clubs and Carbon Pricing. In Cramton, P. et. al (ed.).

Nordhaus, W. (2021) The Spirit of green: the economics of collisions and contagions in a crowded world. Princeton University Press.

Olstrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for a Collective Action. Indiana University. Cambridge University Press.

Olstrom, E. (2014) A Polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance 15-1.

Ou, Y. et al. (2021) Can updated climate pledges limit warming well below 2°C? Science. 2021 Nov 5; 374(6568):693-695.

Parry, I. (2017) Reflections on the International Coordination of Carbon Princing. In Cramton, P. et. al (ed.).

Pindyck, R. (2021) Climate Future: Averting and Adapting to Climate Change. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge.

Prolo, C.D., Penido, G., Santos, I.T., & La Hoz Theuer, S. (2021). Explicando os mercados de carbono na era do Acordo de Paris. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Clima e Sociedade.

Seroa da Motta, R. (2018) Diálogos 4 – Precificação de Carbono – Palestra https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN0OOZK2cqc

Stiglitz, J. (2017) Overcoming the Copenhagen Failure with Flexible Commitments. In Cramton, P. et. al (ed.).

The World Bank (2021) State and trends of carbon pricing 2021.

Tubiana, L. (2021) The Éminence grise at Paris Agreement. Podcast at Cleaningup. Sep, 21.

https://www.cleaningup.live/ep-54-laurence-tubiana-the-eminence-grise-of-the-paris-agreement/

Tubiana, L. (2021) The future of climate policy. Podcast at Columbia Energy Exchange, Dec. 7

Columbia | SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy | The Future of Climate Diplomacy

Warren, R. et al. (2018) The projected effect on insects, vertebrates, and plants of limiting global warming to 1.5oC rather than 2oC. Science, v. 360, Issue 6390.

Wewerinke-Singh, M. & Doebbler, C. (2016) The Paris Agreement: Some Critical Reflections on Process and Substance. University of South Wales Law Journal, volume 39(4).

United Nations - Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2021). Science Panel for the Amazon – Assessment Report 2021, Executive Summary.

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto das Cartas Dynamo n.112 e 113.

Referências bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo n. 110 e 111

Anave (1996) Memórias do setor, Leon Feffer, n. 75, abr/mai-96

Anave (1999) Homenagem – Leon Feffer, n. 85, abr-99

Anave (2006) Leon Feffer: O pioneiro no desenvolvimento da celulose de eucalipto, n.124

Campos E., Foelkel, C. (2016) A evolução tecnológica do setor de celulose e papel no Brasil. ABCTP

Ferreira, M. e Santos, P. (1997) Melhoramento genético dos Eucalyptus no Brasil: breve histórico e perspectivas. Conferência IUFRO

Foelkel, C. (2005) Eucalipto no Brasil, história de pioneirismo. Visão Agrícola n.4, jul-dez-2005.

Foelkel, C. (2016) As biorrefinarias integradas no setor brasileiro de fabricação de celulose e papel de eucalipto. ABCTP, revisão n.7, mai-16.

Material Economics (2018) Sustainable packaging: the role of material substitution

The Pew Charitable Trust (2020) Breaking the plastic wave: a comprehensive assessment of pathways towards stopping ocean plastic solution.

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto das Cartas Dynamo n.110 e 111.

Referências bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo n. 107 e 108

Amazon, (2018) Annual Report

Ansoff, I. (1957) Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review

Bachall, S. (2019) Loonshots: How to Nurture the Crazy Ideas That Win Wars, Cure Diseases, and Transform Industries. St Martin’s Griffin. New York.

Baghai, M. et al., (2007) The Granularity of Growth. TheMckinseyQuarterly, n.2.

Bianchini, S. et all, (2015) What does (not) determine persistent corporate high-growth?

Coad, A. 2007 Firm growth: a Survey. HAL archives-ouvertes.fr 00155762

Das, S. (1995), ‘Size, age and firm growth in an infant industry: The computer hardware industry in India’ International Journal of Industrial Organization 13, 111-126.

Daunfeldt, S. & Halvarsson, D. (2012): Are high-growth firms one-hit wonders? Evidence from Sweden,  HUI Working Papers 73, HUI Research.

Dosi, G. et all, (2019) Long-Term Firm Growth: An Empirical Analysis of

US Manufacturers 1959-2015.

Doz, Y. (2017) The Strategic Decisions That Caused Nokia’s Failure

Dweck, C. (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Ballantine Books, New York.

Hoffmann, R. & Yeh, C. (2018) Blitzscaling: The Lightning-Fast Path to Building Massively Valuable Companies 

Land, G. (1973) Grow or Die: The Unifying Principle of Transformation. Dell, New York.

Penrose, E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press

Smil, V. (2019) Growth: from microorganisms to megacities. The MIT press.

Sutton, J. (1997) Gibrat´s legacy. Journal of Economic Literature vol. XXXV (mar 97).

West, G. (2018) Scale: the universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies and companies. Penguin Books.

Zook, C. & Allen, J. (2016) The Founder's Mentality: How to Overcome the Predictable Crises of Growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto das Cartas Dynamo n.107 e 108.

Referências Bibliográficas da Carta Dynamo n. 105

Axelrod, R., (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, Inc.

Buchanan, J.M. & Tullock (1962) The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor.

Faoro, R. (1979) Os Donos do Poder – Formação do Patronato Político Brasileiro, Editora Globo.

Fukuyama, F. (2006) The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press.

Gottlieb, A. (2016) The Dream of Reason - A History of Western Philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance, W.W. Norton & Company.

 Hirschman, A.O. (1979) As Paixões e os Interesses, Editora Paz e Terra.

 Mancur Olson (1971) The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press.

Markovits, D. (2019) The Meritocracy Trap – How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite, Penguin Press. 

Michael, S. J., (2020) The Tyranny of Merit - What’s Become of the Common Good, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

Pedreira, J. A. (2020) Escolha pela Vida. Entrevista com Luiz Antônio Seabra

https://youtu.be/b9Zzl_gRZuw.

 Platão, (1980) A República, Livros VI e VII, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

 Smith, A. (2005) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, [1790, 6th edition], Metalibri.

 Smith, A. (1999) Teoria dos Sentimentos Morais (1999), Martins Fontes

 Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press.

 Veblen, T. (2009) The Theory of the Leisure Class, Oxford University Press.

 Young, M. (1994) The Rise of the Meritocracy, Transaction Publishers.

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto da Carta Dynamo 105.

Referências Bibliográficas da Carta Dynamo n. 104

Bachcall, S. (2019) Loonshots: How to Nurture the Crazy Ideas That Win Wars, Cure Diseases, and Transform Industries. Library of Congress.

Ball, P. (2004) Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another. Ferrar, Straus and Giroux. New York.

Gladwell, M. (2000) The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little, Brown and Co. New York, Boston, London.

Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I. (1989) Exploring Complexity, an Introduction. W. H. Freeman and Co. New York.

Solé, R. (2011) Phase Transitions. Princeton University Press. Princeton & Oxford.

Thurner, S. et al. (2018) Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems. Oxford University Press.

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto da Carta Dynamo 104

Referências bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo n. 102 e 103

Baldwin., R., di Mauro., B (ed) 2020 Mitigating the COVID economic crisis: act fast and do whatever it takes. A VoxEU.org Book. CEPR Press.

Banco Central do Brasil, 2020 Relatório de Estabilidade Financeira, volume 19, número 1, abril 2020.

Del Valle, S. e Mniszewski, S. 2013 Modeling the Impact of Behavior Changes on the Spread of Pandemic Influenza.

Kissler, S. et al 2020 Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science First Release 14apr.

Krakauer, D. 2020 Rigorous Uncertainty. Santa Fe Institute Transmission Series ep. 1.

Melgaço, J.G. et al 2020 Protective immunity after COVID-19 has been questioned: What can we do without SARS-CoV-2-IgG detection? Cellular Immunology, Volume 353, July 2020.

Ministério da Saúde, 2020 Boletim Epidemiológico Especial COE-Covid n1 a 14.

Tang, F. et al, 2001 Lack of Peripheral Memory B Cell Responses in Recovered Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: A Six-Year Follow-Up Study  The Journal of Immunology 186:7264-7268; May 2011.

Sethi, R. et al. 2020 Roadmap to Pandemic Resilience. Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University.

Wolpert., D. 2020 There’s no free lunch when it comes to making predictions about the COVID-19 pandemic. Santa Fe Institute Transmission Series n. 019

World Health Organization, 2020 R&D Blueprint Covid-19 Experimental Treatments.

World Health Organization, 2020 Novel coronavirus global research and innovation forum: towards a research roadmap.

Tuckett., D. et al.  2020 Making good decision under uncertainty. Santa Fe Institute Transmission Series n. 023

Clique no título acima e conheça a bibliografia que abrange os assuntos relacionados no texto das Cartas Dynamo 102 e 103